Global leadership is something that is increasingly important in
the auto industry, although you don’t often hear a whole lot about
it. Consider, for example, the case of Sergio Marchionne, chairman and
CEO of Chrysler as well as of Fiat (which owns Chrysler). Marchionne was
born in Italy. He attended university in Toronto and Windsor, Canada. He
holds dual Italian and Canadian citizenship. He spends a lot of his time
in Auburn Hills, Michigan.
Or Johan de Nysschen, president of Inftniti Motor Co. He was born
in South Africa, where he eventually joined German company Audi. He
eventually became president of Audi of America. From that job he joined
Inftniti, the luxury brand of Nissan Motor Co. The headquarters office
for lnfinili is in Hong Kong.
Or Carlos Ghosn. He was born in Brazil. Grew up in Lebanon.
Received engineering degrees from schools in Paris. Was COO of Michelin
South America in Brazil, then chairman and CEO of Michelin North
America. Ghosn went to work for French automaker Renault in South
America. In 1999 Renault bought 36.8% of Nissan, and Ghosn became the
Japanese company’s COO. By 2001 he was CEO of Nissan. In 2005 he
was named president and CEO of Renault, as well. So Ghosn runs both
companies, which means he has a desk in both Paris and Yokohama, though
he probably spends most of his time on a plane.
Global leadership, indeed.
I started thinking about the subject a week after the North
American International Auto Show, where the companies based in Asia,
Europe and North America all had a substantial footprint. Whereas
companies from the first two geographical areas might have once been
considered to be “foreign automakers” in Detroit, for the most
part, they’re all just “car companies,” all of which have
people who make some awfully cool stuff. Remember: companies are based
on people, not their products.
This lead to a scholarly paper, “Global Leaders in East ft
West-Do All Global Leaders Lead in the Same Way?” by Anupam Agrawal
and Caroline Rook. It is based on a survey of 1,748 leaders. The short
answer to the question posed in that title is “sort of.” That
is, depending on where the leader is located, some thing’s require
greater emphases than others. Or.
as the authors write, “different cultures place different
values on certain leadership behaviors and styles.”
But one of the aspects of the work that 1 find to be of interest
and applicability is the Global Executive Leadership Inventory (GELI),
which came from another scholarly paper. Essentially, it is a list of 12
behaviors that executives exhibit in varying’ degrees. These
behaviors are things that even those of us who aren’t executives
ought to model in our own spheres, regardless of how circumscribed or
broad they may be:
(*) Visioning: Not just having a vision, but articulating’ it
to all relevant entities
(*) Empowering: Not just letting people have responsibility, but
the information necessary to truly be responsible
(*) Energizing: Leadership needs to provide people with energy
(*) Designing’ ft aligning': Creating an organization
that allows the values and goals to be realized
(*) Rewarding 8t feedback: People aren’t just motivated to
behave in certain ways due to rewards, they need constructive feedback
to develop the behaviors
(*) Team building: This is not just about getting everyone on the
“same team,” but even encouraging constructive conflict
(*) Outside orientation: Remember the customer-as well as the
community that one is a part of
(*) Global mindset: Before there was “One Ford” there
were lots of Fords
(*) Tenacity: Rome wasn’t built in a day
(*) Emotional intelligence: Not everyone can or should agree with
everyone else; but there must be respect and thoughtfulness
(*) Life balance: Those who work relentlessly get things done: they
also bum out
(*) Resilience to stress: Without a doubt, stress is part of the
job-as well as life off the job; managing it is crucial.
It isn’t just Marchionne, de Nysschen, Ghosn, and their peers
at the tops of giant organizations who must manifest these aspects,
though it is certainly crucial that they do so. As they must dial their
approaches depending on where they’re operating. Agrawal and Rook
write, “The idea of visioning, for example, is less important for
Russians than for Americans.” In mid-2013 Ghosn also became
chairman of Russia’s AVTOVAZ; presumably his approach is somewhat
different in Tolyatti than in Nashville.
We are not all executives. But we are, in our own ways, leaders.
Those 12 items should be thing’s we are mindful of. (*)
The post The 12 Habits of Highly Effective… appeared first on 2014 Stingray.
from WordPress http://ift.tt/1KXXalH
via IFTTT
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario